Skip to content
Home » Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India (1979) Summary for UPSC Polity Notes

Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India (1979) Summary for UPSC Polity Notes

1. What is the Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India Case all about?

The Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India case in 1979 is a landmark judgement that dealt with the principles of fairness and equality in administrative actions by public authorities. The case arose when Ramana Dayaram Shetty challenged the awarding of a contract by the International Airport Authority of India (IAAI) for running a restaurant at the Bombay airport, alleging that the contract was awarded in a discriminatory and arbitrary manner.

2. Facts of the Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India Case Relevant for UPSC

  • Parties Involved: Ramana Dayaram Shetty (petitioner) vs. The International Airport Authority of India (respondent).
  • Legal Questions:
  • Whether the IAAI, as a public authority, is bound by the principles of non-arbitrariness and fairness in awarding contracts.
  • Whether the awarding of the contract by IAAI violated Article 14 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees equality before the law.
  • Noteworthy Events:
  • The IAAI invited tenders for running a restaurant at the Bombay airport.
  • Ramana Dayaram Shetty submitted a tender but was not awarded the contract, which instead went to another party who did not meet all the stipulated qualifications.
  • Shetty challenged the decision, claiming it was arbitrary and discriminatory.

3. What are the Major Judgements/Changes Brought by Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India Case?

The Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement emphasizing the principles of administrative fairness and equality:

  • The Court held that public authorities are bound by the principles of non-arbitrariness and fairness in their actions and decisions.
  • It ruled that any action by a public authority that is arbitrary or discriminatory violates Article 14 of the Constitution.
  • The Court emphasized that public tenders must be conducted transparently and fairly, ensuring equal opportunity for all bidders.

4. What was the Impact of Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India Case on Indian Constitution?

  • Administrative Law: The case significantly impacted administrative law by establishing that all actions by public authorities must be fair, transparent, and non-arbitrary.
  • Equality and Non-discrimination: It reinforced the constitutional guarantee of equality before the law and non-discrimination in the actions of public authorities.
  • Public Contracting: The judgement set a precedent for fairness in public contracting, ensuring that public resources are allocated transparently and equitably.

5. Was this Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. The International Airport Authority of India Case Challenged/Reversed in Future?

The principles established in this case have been upheld in subsequent judgements. The ruling continues to influence administrative actions and the conduct of public authorities, ensuring that they adhere to the principles of fairness and equality.

6. Doctrines/Theories/New Concepts

  • Doctrine of Non-arbitrariness in Public Contracts: The case underscored that public authorities must act fairly and without arbitrariness in awarding contracts, ensuring transparency and equal opportunity for all participants, thus upholding the rule of law and the principles of justice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.