Skip to content
Home » Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker (2016) Summary for UPSC Polity Notes

Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker (2016) Summary for UPSC Polity Notes

1. What is the Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker Case all about?

The Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker case in 2016 is a significant judgement concerning the powers of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker of a Legislative Assembly, particularly related to disqualification proceedings under the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution. The case arose in the context of a political crisis in Arunachal Pradesh, where the Deputy Speaker attempted to disqualify certain MLAs while the Speaker’s removal motion was pending.

2. Facts of the Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker Case Relevant for UPSC

  • Parties Involved: Nabam Rebia (Speaker of Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly), Bamang Felix, and other MLAs (petitioners) vs. Deputy Speaker (respondent).
  • Legal Questions:
  • Whether the Deputy Speaker has the authority to disqualify MLAs under the Tenth Schedule when a motion for the Speaker’s removal is pending.
  • The extent of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker’s powers in disqualification proceedings.
  • Noteworthy Events:
  • A political crisis in Arunachal Pradesh led to a motion for the removal of the Speaker, Nabam Rebia.
  • While the motion was pending, the Deputy Speaker initiated disqualification proceedings against certain MLAs.
  • The disqualified MLAs challenged the Deputy Speaker’s authority to disqualify them while the motion for the Speaker’s removal was pending.

3. What are the Major Judgements/Changes Brought by Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker Case?

The Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement with significant implications for legislative procedures:

  • The Court held that the Speaker or Deputy Speaker cannot disqualify MLAs under the Tenth Schedule while a motion for their removal is pending. This is to ensure that the Speaker or Deputy Speaker acts impartially.
  • It reaffirmed the principle that the Speaker or Deputy Speaker must not misuse their powers for political gains and must act in a fair and unbiased manner.

4. What was the Impact of Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker Case on Indian Constitution?

  • Checks and Balances: The judgement reinforced the checks and balances within the legislative framework, ensuring that the powers of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker are exercised impartially.
  • Protection of Legislative Procedures: It protected the integrity of legislative procedures by preventing the misuse of disqualification powers during the pendency of a motion for removal.

5. Was this Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker Case Challenged/Reversed in Future?

The principles established in the Nabam Rebia case have been upheld in subsequent legal proceedings and continue to guide the conduct of Speakers and Deputy Speakers in legislative assemblies across India.

6. Doctrines/Theories/New Concepts

  • Doctrine of Impartiality in Legislative Disqualification: The case underscored the importance of impartiality in the exercise of disqualification powers by the Speaker and Deputy Speaker, ensuring that these powers are not used for political maneuvering, thereby upholding the principles of fair play and justice in legislative proceedings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.