Actual Article
Article 177: Rights of Ministers and Advocate-General as respects the Houses
Every Minister and the Advocate-General for a State shall have the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, the Legislative Assembly or, in the case of a State having a Legislative Council, in either House, and to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, any committee of the Legislature of which he may be named a member, but shall not by virtue of this article be entitled to vote.
UPSC Notes for Article 177
Explanation:
- Participation of Ministers and Advocate-General:
- Article 177 grants every Minister and the Advocate-General the right to speak and participate in the proceedings of the State Legislature, regardless of whether they are members of that body. This includes participation in both Houses if the state has a bicameral legislature, and extends to committee meetings of the legislature.
Key Points:
- Voice without Vote: While Ministers and the Advocate-General can participate in debates and contribute to the discussions in the legislative processes, they do not have the right to vote in the Legislature unless they are duly elected members of one of the Houses.
- Legislative Interaction: This provision ensures that the executive has a voice in the legislative process, facilitating better coordination between the executive and legislative branches of the state government.
Important Cases and Commissions Related to Article 177
Cases:
- No specific landmark cases have been identified that interpret Article 177 directly, as it primarily deals with the procedural involvement of executive members in legislative processes.
Commissions:
- Second Administrative Reforms Commission: Has discussed the interaction between the executive and legislature, emphasizing the importance of such interactions for coherent governance, although it does not specifically address Article 177.
Important Reports:
- Law Commission Reports: While not directly mentioning Article 177, have often dealt with constitutional amendments and reforms that enhance the efficiency and accountability of governance, which indirectly supports the rationale behind such provisions.
Previous Year Prelims Questions Related to Article 177
- (UPSC Prelims 2016) Who among the following has the right to speak and participate in the proceedings of the State Legislature but cannot vote?
- A. State Legislative Council Chairman
- B. Leader of the Opposition in the Assembly
- C. Ministers and the Advocate-General
- D. Members of the Lok Sabha from the State Correct Answer: C. Ministers and the Advocate-General
- (UPSC Prelims 2018) What are the rights of Ministers in the legislative assembly as per Article 177?
- A. To vote on any bill
- B. To speak and take part in proceedings without voting
- C. To propose legislation without discussion
- D. To chair committee meetings Correct Answer: B. To speak and take part in proceedings without voting
Previous Year Mains Questions Related to Article 177
- Mains 2016: “Discuss the significance of allowing Ministers and the Advocate-General to participate in the proceedings of the State Legislature as per Article 177. What impact does this have on legislative deliberations?”
- Mains 2019: “Evaluate the role of non-member participants like Ministers and the Advocate-General in the legislative process of a state as outlined in Article 177. How does this facilitate governance?”
Additional Insights:
- Integrative Governance: By allowing Ministers and the Advocate-General to participate in legislative proceedings, Article 177 helps integrate policy-making with legislative oversight, ensuring that laws are well-informed and aligned with executive policies.
- Expertise in Legislation: The involvement of the Advocate-General, who is the chief legal advisor to the state government, ensures that legal perspectives are adequately represented in legislative debates, enhancing the quality of legislative scrutiny.
Understanding Article 177 is crucial for UPSC aspirants as it highlights the participatory rights of key executive figures in state legislative processes, underscoring the importance of collaborative governance mechanisms. This knowledge is essential for both preliminary and main examinations, offering insights into the checks and balances that characterize democratic governance.