In the wake of significant socio-political upheaval, societies often find themselves at a crossroads, where the choices made in the aftermath of dissent can shape the trajectory of the nation for years to come. The aftermath of a civil disobedience movement is particularly poignant, as it marks a period of introspection, negotiation, and, most importantly, strategic planning for the future.
As witnessed throughout history, civil disobedience movements serve as powerful catalysts for change, often challenging the status quo and galvanizing populations to demand justice, equality, and systemic reform. However, the true test of the movement’s impact lies not only in its ability to mobilize masses but also in its capacity to effectuate lasting change and build a more equitable society.
1st Stage of Debate
During this time, leaders who wanted freedom for their country talked about what they should do next since the big protests had stopped. They needed to think about new ways to keep fighting against the British rulers. They considered doing things like helping society get better, making changes in how things worked, and still pushing for freedom but in ways that followed the law.
Provincial Elections of 1937:
In 1937, there were elections in different parts of India, according to the Government of India Act, 1935. People debated whether the nationalist parties should take part in these elections and join the provincial governments formed under this Act. Some thought it was a chance to work within the system and push for more changes, while others worried it might mean giving in to British rule.
Nehru’s Socialist Vision:
Nehru had big dreams for India, wanting to make it fairer for everyone. He believed in socialism, where the wealth and power were shared by everyone. Nehru felt disappointed when the Civil Disobedience Movement stopped and when the nationalist leaders decided to join councils set up by the British. He thought it was like giving up on the big changes they wanted.
Challenges and Solutions:
To fight back, Nehru wanted to focus on making things better for poor farmers and workers. He said the Congress party should listen more to them and challenge the rich landlords and business owners. He also suggested creating groups for farmers and workers to join and influence the Congress party’s decisions. According to Nehru, including these groups in the fight against British rule was vital for making real changes in India.
2nd Stage of Debate
Opposition to the 1935 Act:
Everyone in the Congress agreed that they didn’t like the Government of India Act, 1935, but they weren’t sure what to do about it when big protests weren’t possible.
Election Strategy:
The Congress decided it should join the elections for provincial assemblies. They thought this would help more people understand why British rule was bad.
Post-Election Strategy:
After the elections, people argued about what to do if the Congress won a lot of seats. Some said they shouldn’t work with the British government at all, even if it meant not forming a government. Others thought they should cooperate to run the province better.
Ideological Divide:
The argument about what to do after the elections split the Congress into two groups: left and right. This showed bigger differences in how they saw things.
Left vs. Right:
The left-leaning group wanted to keep fighting against the British no matter what, even if it meant not taking part in the government. The right-leaning group thought it was smarter to work with the British government to make things better, step by step.
The argument after the elections showed that the Congress had different ideas about how to get India free from British rule. These disagreements would keep affecting what they did until India became independent in 1947.
Office Acceptance
Opposition to Office Acceptance:
Nehru, Bose, and others from the Congress who were socialists or communists didn’t like the idea of joining the government under the Government of India Act, 1935. They said it would weaken the fight against the Act and the movement for freedom. They thought working within the system would take attention away from important issues like freedom, fairness, and helping poor people.
Alternative Strategy:
Instead of joining the government, the leftists wanted to go into the councils to cause problems and make it hard for the Act to work. They also wanted to bring workers and farmers into the Congress party and make it more about socialism.
Proponents of Office Acceptance:
But some people thought joining the government was okay for now because there wasn’t a big protest movement. They said only mass protests could get freedom, but they didn’t want to leave the government to people who supported the British.
Balancing Act:
Those who wanted to join the government knew it was risky because they might start to agree with the government too much. But they thought they could fight against that and still do good things while in the government. They believed that even though the government didn’t have a lot of power, they could still use it to help the nationalist cause.
The argument about joining the government showed how hard it was for the nationalist movement to decide what to do under British rule. They had to think about how to fight for freedom while also dealing with the government’s rules and power.
Position of Gandhi
Initial Opposition:
At first, Gandhi didn’t like the idea of joining the government. He worried it might make the movement weaker and go against its beliefs.
Shift in Stance:
But by early 1936, Gandhi started to think differently. He thought maybe trying to join the government could be worth a shot because things were changing politically, and they needed to try new ways to fight for freedom.
Congress Resolutions:
Under Gandhi’s influence, the Congress decided to take part in the elections but didn’t decide about joining the government until later. They said they were still going to fight against the colonial system, whether they were in the government or not.
Election Participation:
In February 1937, there were elections in eleven provinces. Even though they didn’t like the system, the Congress still joined the elections. They thought it was a way to keep fighting for freedom, even if they had to work within the system.
In simple terms, Gandhi’s view on joining the government showed he was practical. He knew it was important to keep fighting against British rule, but he also thought they should try everything they could to make progress toward Indian independence.
Also Read: Gandhi and Harijans