The Round Table Conferences stand as pivotal chapters in the saga of India’s struggle for independence from British colonial rule. Held in the early 1930s, these conferences were groundbreaking gatherings where Indian leaders, British officials, and representatives from various Indian princely states came together to discuss the future constitutional setup of India. Against the backdrop of escalating tensions and widespread civil unrest, the Round Table Conferences represented a significant attempt at finding a peaceful and negotiated solution to the complex issues surrounding India’s governance. These conferences were named “Round Table” to symbolize the equality and inclusivity of all participants, regardless of their background or status.
Background
The Round Table Conferences were organized by the British government during a time of tension in India. The Simon Commission report, released in 1930, came out amid government crackdowns and increased protests from the civil disobedience movement. The report didn’t mention granting dominion status to India, which angered even the moderate Indian leaders. In response, the Viceroy invited Indian leaders to a series of Round Table Conferences between 1930 and 1932 to discuss India’s future government.
First Round Table Conference
- In response to the Simon Report’s flaws, the Labour Government, led by Ramsay MacDonald, decided to host a series of Round Table Conferences in London.
- The first conference began on November 12th, 1930, with Ramsay MacDonald presiding over it.
- Participants included representatives from Princely States, the Muslim League, Justice Party, Hindu Mahasabha, and others.
- However, the Indian National Congress and other major politicians didn’t join due to Congress’s decision to boycott, and many leaders were jailed for their involvement in the Civil Disobedience Movement.
- Discussions centered around the federal government’s structure, executive accountability, and separate electorates for “untouchables” proposed by Dr. B R Ambedkar. Tej Bahadur Sapru suggested an All-India Federation, which the Muslim League supported.
- It was agreed that if India were to become a federation, safeguards would be needed for defense and finance, while other departments would be transferred.
- Despite these discussions, the Indian National Congress leaders continued the Civil Disobedience Movement during the First Round Table Conference, leading to its failure.
Second Round Table Conference
- The British Government realized the importance of Congress’s involvement in the Round Table Conferences for effective reforms and hoped INC leaders would join the Second Round Table Conference. Gandhi and Lord Irwin signed the Gandhi-Irwin Pact on March 5, 1931, agreeing that Congress would stop the Civil Disobedience Movement and attend the conference.
- The Second Round Table Conference took place on September 7, 1931, in London, chaired by Ramsay MacDonald. Gandhi represented the Indian National Congress, while other participants included the Muslim League, Hindu Mahasabha, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar, and others. Representatives from Burma and various Indian provinces also attended.
- Gandhi demanded the immediate establishment of responsible government at national and provincial levels, stating Congress was India’s sole political representative. He rejected the idea of separate electorates for untouchables and opposed special safeguards for Muslims and other minorities. However, many delegates disagreed with Gandhi.
- The conference ended without much agreement, widening the gap between Congress and minorities. MacDonald announced the creation of two Muslim-majority provinces, NWFP and Sindh, and formed an Indian Consultative Committee. He also mentioned a committee on franchise, finance, and states, and hinted at the possibility of a unilateral British Communal Award, which concerned many.
Third Round Table Conference
- When Gandhi returned from the second round table conference, he restarted the Civil Disobedience Movement because the British Government refused to grant immediate Dominion Status. After the Round Table Conference failed, Gandhi and other Congress leaders were arrested again, and Congress was declared illegal.
- The third Round Table Conference took place on November 17, 1932, in London, chaired by Ramsay MacDonald. Though 46 delegates attended, the Indian National Congress and the UK Labour Party decided not to participate. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar represented the Depressed Classes, and Indian princely states sent their princes and divans. Muslim leaders like Muhammad Ali, Agha Khan, Fazlul Haq, and Jinnah also attended.
- During the conference, reports from the Sub-Committees formed during the Second Round Table Conference were discussed. Some details about the new constitution were settled, but progressive provisions pushed by Indian delegates were ignored. The question of including a Bill of Rights for citizens was also dismissed.
- In March 1933, the British Government issued a White Paper containing proposals for the new Constitution of India. Based on this, the Government of India Act of 1935 was enacted.
In conclusion, the Round Table Conferences represent significant milestones in India’s struggle for independence from British colonial rule. Despite efforts to facilitate dialogue and negotiation between Indian leaders and British officials, the conferences ultimately failed to produce meaningful agreements that could satisfy the aspirations of all parties involved. The Round Table Conferences highlighted the complexities and challenges inherent in the process of constitutional reform and nation-building in a diverse and deeply divided society like India. Issues such as the structure of government, representation of different communities, and safeguards for minority rights remained contentious and unresolved.
While the conferences did lead to some important developments, such as the discussions on the future constitution of India and the eventual enactment of the Government of India Act of 1935, they also underscored the deep-seated divisions and distrust between Indian nationalist leaders and the British government.
Moreover, the failure of the Round Table Conferences ultimately contributed to the escalation of tensions and the resurgence of mass movements like the Civil Disobedience Movement, as Indian leaders became increasingly frustrated with the lack of progress towards their goal of complete independence. Nevertheless, the Round Table Conferences remain significant in shaping the trajectory of India’s struggle for freedom, providing valuable lessons for future generations about the challenges and complexities of achieving political and constitutional reform in a diverse and complex society.
Also Read: Communal Award and Poona Pact